Jeremy's server isn't syncing again

Stuart Harris stuart at
Thu Oct 28 13:29:34 PDT 2004

Just as an idea, why dot we just switch the whole site to svn? or CVS,
or ... that way we get what's changed, as it changes, and only what's
changed.. even with the whole timestamp bit, it'll still mean we get the
whole site everytime the timestamp is updated.

On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 23:00, Jeremy Utley wrote:
> Jeremy Utley wrote:
> > Randy McMurchy wrote:
> >
> >> I'm think Jeremy reads this list, so I'm posting here.
> >>
> >> It appears Jeremy's server is not syncing BLFS again. Best I can
> >> tell it is about a week behind.
> >>
> > Don't think it's my server this time. is also behind, 
> > as are a lot of others.
> >
> > Alexander, did your recent alterations of by any 
> > chance mess with the setting of the timestamp?  A change in the 
> > timestamp is what triggers an update - without that, any mirror that 
> > uses the published rsync script will not sync properly.
> >
> > -J-
> Oops, sorry, I meant Anderson :)
> Looks like that's the case - the timestamp file that triggers a mirror 
> to rsync hasn't changed in quite some time, which is why my mirror is 
> not sync'ing.  I'll force a manual update for now.  Anderson - please 
> check your render-website script to ensure it's properly updating this 
> timestamp, or we need to notify all mirror maintainers to alter their 
> scripts to rsync the website.
> -J-
Stuart Harris <stuart at>
Intermedia Network Services Pte Ltd.

More information about the website mailing list