[lfs-dev] Missing option for grub-install?
pierre.labastie at neuf.fr
Mon Jan 21 12:06:04 PST 2019
On 21/01/2019 18:21, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
> On 01/21/2019 09:05 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
>> On 21/01/2019 11:09, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
>>> On 2019-01-21 10:44 +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
>>>> My machine has an UEFI BIOS, so that I rarely run grub-install. But
>>>> I built a new qemu VM, with a non-UEFI (virtual) BIOS. When running
>>>> grub-install, it failed with a message (sorry, I haven't saved it) telling
>>>> that it could not find /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi. Running "grub-install
>>>> --target TARGET install GRUB for TARGET platform [default=x86_64-efi]
>>>> so I had to run "grub-install --target i386-pc /dev/sda". But now that I have
>>>> done that, "grub-install --help" returns:
>>>> --target TARGET install GRUB for TARGET platform [default=i386-pc]
>>>> So the default seems to be what is already installed. Checking the source for
>>>> grub-install confirms that. I must have taken a virtual disk used for a
>>>> VM with UEFI BIOS.
>>> No. Grub 2.02 is detecting the target dynamically at runtime by checking if
>>> /sys/firmware/efi is empty. At first time your system was booted via UEFI so
>>> this is not empty. But at the second time your system was booted via Legacy
>>> BIOS so this is empty.
>> You are right about the process, but what amazes me is that the first boot was
>> not particularly EFI. I had a DOS partitioning (not GPT), and no /boot/EFI
>> dir, and yet it must have found something in /sys/firmware/efi since it
>> proposed x86_64 as the default (I do have the EFI switches on in the kernel).
>> Well, looks like it will be hard to reproduce.
>>>> Should we add this switch (--target i386-pc) to the grub-install command in
>>>> the book?
>>> If the host is booted via UEFI we'll need that to install a non-UEFI Grub.
>>> But I think it's dangerous (may break the booting process of the host). We
>>> should explain this option more seriously (maybe in a "NOTE" or even
>> Yes, that may break machines with only UEFI boot. I think the command should
>> be written without "--target", as it is now, but a note should be added to
>> explain that the --target option may be used if the wrong if the application
>> default is wrong
> Agree. Please do that when you get a chance.
I've added a note at r11503. Not sure I have the wording right.
More information about the lfs-dev