zarniwhoop at ntlworld.com
Fri Feb 19 18:04:07 PST 2016
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:51:43PM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 2/19/2016 3:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >I've built the new glibc in my sandbox and will start doing a -rc2 when
> >my full build completes in the next hour or so.
> >I did look at the test failures:
> >XPASS: elf/tst-protected1a
> >XPASS: elf/tst-protected1b
> >FAIL: posix/tst-getaddrinfo4
> >FAIL: posix/tst-getaddrinfo5
> None of the stuff from the tarball in 418 has been added. Next release.
A shame - I gave up when I realised the tarball only built the tests.
It looks as if understanding how to invoke new glibc tests is way
beyond my comprehension.
> >I've updated the text to add posix/tst-getaddrinfo5 to the list of known
> >failures. When I look at the text we have now, I also see:
> >* The rt/tst-cputimer1 and rt/tst-cpuclock2 tests have been known to
> >fail. The reason is not completely understood, but indications are that
> >minor timing issues can trigger these failures.
> I think I had still seen one of the mentioned tests when building on single
> processor in KVM, but don't recall which. I'll get a build on KVM before
> release day.
That is good to hear.
This email was written using 100% recycled letters.
More information about the lfs-dev