[lfs-dev] glibc-2.23

Douglas R. Reno renodr2002 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 19 14:50:04 PST 2016


On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've built the new glibc in my sandbox and will start doing a -rc2 when my
> full build completes in the next hour or so.
>
> I did look at the test failures:
>
> XPASS: elf/tst-protected1a
> XPASS: elf/tst-protected1b
> FAIL: posix/tst-getaddrinfo4
> FAIL: posix/tst-getaddrinfo5
> Summary of test results:
>       2 FAIL
>    2401 PASS
>      84 XFAIL
>       2 XPASS
>
> I've updated the text to add posix/tst-getaddrinfo5 to the list of known
> failures.  When I look at the text we have now, I also see:
>
> * The rt/tst-cputimer1 and rt/tst-cpuclock2 tests have been known to fail.
> The reason is not completely understood, but indications are that minor
> timing issues can trigger these failures.
>
> * The math tests sometimes fail when running on systems where the CPU is
> not a relatively new Intel or AMD processor.
>
> * Other tests known to fail on some architectures are
> malloc/tst-malloc-usable and nptl/tst-cleanupx4.
>
> I have already removed the text about tst-protected1{a,b}.
>
> I have not seen any of these in a long time. Should I remove them?
>
>   -- Bruce


Are these i686 specific?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/attachments/20160219/4ca0912b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list