[lfs-dev] Recent patches

Douglas R. Reno renodr2002 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 16 19:24:07 PST 2016


On Feb 16, 2016 9:22 PM, "Bruce Dubbs" <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>> Douglas R. Reno wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've gone ahead and committed changes to incorporate patches for recent
>>>> upstream commits.  After a full build, I'm a little uncomfortable about
>>>> the
>>>> gcc patch.  It is 7648 lines and the build shows several unexpected
>>>> failures that were not present before.
>>>>
>>
>>>>        === gcc Summary ===
>>>>
>>>> # of expected passes    114794
>>>> # of unexpected failures   26
>>>> # of expected failures     262
>>>> # of unsupported tests     1794
>>>>
>>>> -------------------
>>>>
>>>> How should we approach this?  The easy way is to not apply the new
patch.
>>>> Additionally I do not know what the patch is supposed to fix.
>>>>
>>>> How should we go on this?  I will hold off on -rc2 until we can reach a
>>>> consensus.
>>
>>
>>> I am inclined to leave the patch out. Just in time actually, as I will
run
>>> a build overnight for -rc2, and I will see if these still appear without
>>> the patch. I can easily run another build if the consensus it to leave
it
>>> in the book. These test results look very eerie.
>>
>>
>> I'm running a test right now without the patch to compare.  Chapter 6 gcc
>> started about 20 minutes ago.
>
>
> gcc is done.  No gcc or g++ unexpected failures (2 in libstdc++ that
we've seen before).
>
> I'm going to remove it form -dev.
>
>
>   -- Bruce
>
Ok, I will remove the commented sections from systemd tomorrow, unless DJ
beats me to it :-)

Douglas R. Reno
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/attachments/20160216/095f999d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list