[lfs-dev] [blfs-dev] Thinking about a new LFS Live CD/iso
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Mon Apr 18 15:32:41 PDT 2016
dueffert at uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I've been thinking thinking about a new Live CD/Rescue CD based on LFS.
>> It would be much less ambitious than the old one that included an X
>> What I had in mind is a base LFS system with the following: [...]
> Sounds good!
>> What else?
> if uncluding mc, then its dependencies - at least glib and libffi.
> libssh2 has been handy here too (for virtual sftp file system support),
> though I recognize it is not even in the book :-(
Yes, of course the dependent libraries must be included. I was just
listing end user utilities.
> if not including any graphics library, what's the advantage of links over
> lynx? Just personal preference?
For the little I use them, they are equivalent. Is there a reason to
prefer one over the other?
More information about the lfs-dev