[lfs-dev] [blfs-dev] Thinking about a new LFS Live CD/iso

Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Mon Apr 18 15:32:41 PDT 2016

dueffert at uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I've been thinking thinking about a new Live CD/Rescue CD based on LFS.
>> It would be much less ambitious than the old one that included an X
>> implementation.
>> What I had in mind is a base LFS system with the following: [...]
> Sounds good!
>> What else?
> if uncluding mc, then its dependencies - at least glib and libffi.
> libssh2 has been handy here too (for virtual sftp file system support),
> though I recognize it is not even in the book :-(

Yes, of course the dependent libraries must be included.  I was just 
listing end user utilities.

> if not including any graphics library, what's the advantage of links over
> lynx? Just personal preference?

For the little I use them, they are equivalent.  Is there a reason to 
prefer one over the other?

   -- Bruce

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list