[lfs-dev] udev, eudev, mdev
devel at pollock-nageoire.net
Wed Mar 5 00:41:00 PST 2014
From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] udev, eudev, mdev
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:43:49 -0600
> Armin K. wrote:
>> On 03/04/2014 04:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> I've been working on udev and have got it to build with the systemd-210
>>> source. The problem is that it is getting more and more intertwined
>>> with the rest of systemd requiring things that don't seem to be applicable.
>>> For instance,
>>> filea.c requires a function from
>>> fileb.c which requires a function from
>>> The problem is that filea really doesn't require anything from filec,
>>> but the build process doesn't like unresolved references.
>>> My question is whether we need to try either eudev or mdev. Does anyone
>>> have any experience with eudev or mdev?
>>> I note that the latest eudev is dated today.
>> eudev is rather the udev from pre-systemd merge with all the latest
>> fixes pulled from systemd tree.
>> Note sure, but I think mdev is something else and not really compatible
>> with original udev. eudev seems to be the best solution for (B)LFS.
> One difference that jumped out at me was that systemd's libudev is 1.4.0
> and eudev's version is 1.3.0. I don't know how much that changes things.
> eudev wants gperf and gtk-doc. We could add gperf to LFS and probably
> do away with both gperf and the gudev build in BLFS. gtk-doc needs
> several other prerequisites and is not a candidate for LFS, but I don't
> think that's needed.
On clfs we used eudev 1.3 but nieghter gperf nor gtk-doc are
> -- Bruce
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
More information about the lfs-dev