[lfs-dev] LFS SVN and Systemd Report
zarniwhoop at ntlworld.com
Thu May 31 08:21:49 PDT 2012
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:05:05AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Here's an update. I forgot that  are quotes in autoconf, so you
> usually end up using test instead. I still didn't test it works all
> the way, but I think configure should run.
Thanks. I'll take a look later.
> Allow me to get on my soapbox here for a minute.
> Nearly all the energy in LFS is used on building packages and all the
> associated issues with bootstrapping systems. Ask yourself, what
> percentage of the packages you're building use the autotools? 50%?
> 75%? 90%? The percentage is high regardless. IMO, if what you're
> interested in is building packages, then learning the process the
> build is created would be a great investment. I see so much time spent
> here trying to work around build issues and basically guessing at how
> the build works. I almost never see someone actually diagnose the
> issue at the root when the autotools are involved.
I've tried to understand the docs before, but perhaps I started
with the wrong mindset : usually "I need to fix _this_ specific
problem, and I want to do it *quickly*".
> The autotools are unusual, but they really aren't that complex. One of
> my real "oh" moments when I was still building LFS was when I saw an
> analysis Greg did of a configure bug and realized that it really
> wasn't that complex at all. At Xorg a guy showed up and wanted to help
> on build issues but had never seen the autotools before. Within a few
> months he was squashing bugs all over the place and now he's basically
> the expert there. It's a really handy skill set because of the
> ubiquity of the autotools.
> The documentation is very good:
> Old, but will teach you the basics:
> I will now return to lurking.
Thanks, I'll set aside some time to start with the autobook.
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
More information about the lfs-dev