[lfs-dev] kbd

Qrux qrux.qed at gmail.com
Fri May 18 12:36:35 PDT 2012


On May 18, 2012, at 8:12 AM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:

> On 5/18/12 5:22 AM, Qrux wrote:
>> But, let's not make it a crime to clarify.  If Ken would rather assert
>> that I'm not "new" to the community, then to the extent that his
>> assertion is valid I'd say that I see a lot of GroupThink(TM) in LFS.
>> Most is probably good.  But there are often ruffled feathers when
>> long-held assumptions from time immemorial are questioned.  I figure
>> decisions about LFS aren't usually proofs.  It stands to reason, then
>> that those decisions can be questioned.
> 
> I could be wrong, but I think what is happening is that the length and 
> style of your emails reads as a bit aggressive and ends up being a 
> little off-putting.

Quite fair.  I'll work on it.

I do appreciate all the responses, and I think my question has been
answered on the kbd/resizecons issue.

I'll let you and Bruce continue on about experimentation, etc.  I would
ordinarily chime in (and suggest probably more flame-worthy stuff like
moving to git would foster more experimentation, because the effort of
merging would be front-loaded on forkers--not trunk maintainers) but
I'll take a break for a bit, and wait until this episode cools off.

	Q




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list