[lfs-dev] Util-Linux configure options
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Tue Mar 6 14:23:49 PST 2012
James Robertson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Andrew Benton <b3nton at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:00:38 -0600
>> Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> My proposal is to just skip 'arch' completely as I do not believe it is
>>> not used anywhere in LFS/BLFS.
>> It is used in several places in BLFS (eg the pages for Liba52, nss and
>> nspr), but I'm sure uname -m will work just as well.
> We discussed the whole arch vs uname -m thing here
> and I thought the decision was to just go with the one in util linux and
> let it be. Seems to be we are re-hashing something not worth the effort.
Between the changes in LFS and BLFS today, it's already done.
More information about the lfs-dev