[lfs-dev] Util-Linux configure options

Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Tue Mar 6 14:23:49 PST 2012


James Robertson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Andrew Benton <b3nton at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:00:38 -0600
>> Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My proposal is to just skip 'arch' completely as I do not believe it is
>>> not used anywhere in LFS/BLFS.
>> It is used in several places in BLFS (eg the pages for Liba52, nss and
>> nspr), but I'm sure uname -m will work just as well.
>>
>>
> We discussed the whole arch vs uname -m thing here
> 
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2012-February/065811.html
> 
> and I thought the decision was to just go with the one in util linux and
> let it be.  Seems to be we are re-hashing something not worth the effort.

Between the changes in LFS and BLFS today, it's already done.

   -- Bruce



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list