[lfs-dev] Possible problem with current glibc (LFS 7.2 cant recompile LFS 7.2)

Ken Moffat zarniwhoop at ntlworld.com
Sun Aug 26 15:53:53 PDT 2012


On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 05:24:42PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> 
> 
> It would now appear there is an error in the sunrpc portion of the 
> Makefile that is calling the wrong gcc.  I guess it didn't fail for me 
> because I did install libtirpc for testing samba.
> 
 I surmise that Jasmine failed to install the rpc headers, which we
do in chapter 6.  But, that has highlighted the issue for those of
us who did install them.

> I don't know if changing the gcc to x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc would be 
> sufficient or not, but I think we need to do that as a minimum.
> 
 Your reply came in while I was composing my follow-up.  I refer you
back to my initial posting where I pointed to a post on libc-alpha -
glibc-2.16.0 appears to have been changed so that it will install
some rpc stuff even if cross-compiling, so from upstream's POV it
iis using the _right_ gcc.

 My current theory is that overriding the compiler *and* using the
internal headers in chapter 5 glibs will suffice, but I'll use
--enable-obsolete-rpc headers in chapter 6.  I'm doing a fresh
build, it's just got to ch5 glibc.

>    -- Bruce
> 
> Note:
> 
> `-MF FILE'
>    When used with the driver options `-MD' or `-MMD', `-MF' overrides
>    the default dependency output file.
> 
> `-MP'
>    This option instructs CPP to add a phony target for each dependency
>    other than the main file, causing each to depend on nothing.  These
>    dummy rules work around errors `make' gives if you remove header
>    files without updating the `Makefile' to match.
> 
> `-MMD'
>       Like `-MD' except mention only user header files, not system
>       header files.
> 
> `-MT TARGET' An `-MT' option will set the target to be exactly the
>               string you specify.

 Heh, I'll leave these options to you, I'm too stupid to get htem
right :)

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list