Question about chapter 6: file before gcc
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 09:39:08 PDT 2011
Jonathan Oksman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com> wrote:
>> There are multiple ways of solving a problem. What new problem does
>> your suggestion solve?
> I suppose my arguments are a matter of opinion though. I'm in the
> process of a test build with this suggested rearrangement due to
> curiosity. I have my doubts that it will have a major impact on the
> build of file, but I'll know in a little bit once I can do a diff.
The old way worked OK, but just issued some warnings. Remember that the
builds in Chapter 6 *are* using the new gcc and binutils that you built
in Chapter 5.
More information about the lfs-dev