Using the LSB Bootscripts

Jeremy Huntwork jhuntwork at
Tue May 10 19:23:07 PDT 2011

On 5/10/11 9:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Unnecessary.  The book copyright already covers it.

Except, if I am understanding it correctly, if LightCube OS uses and 
distributes it, we are bound by that license to keep the it with the 
code and we have no other tie to the book. So putting the license 
explicitly with the code in its package would be useful to us. Also, 
technically, the code is currently being distributed by you in packaged 
format without a license, because anyone could come across the link to 
the code without any direct reference to the book.

Anyway, I don't really see why this would be an objection or problem. 
One LICENSE file that's static and forever unchanging can't possibly be 
a burden for you guys to add?


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list