Glibc-2.14 issues

DJ Lucas dj at
Tue Jun 7 18:23:41 PDT 2011

On 06/07/2011 09:49 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:14:59 -0500, DJ Lucas<dj at>  wrote:
>> On 06/06/2011 03:07 PM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>>> I'd prefer for us not to use HJL's binutils
>> Then don't. That patch doesn't look all that need to add
>> tests for local build fix, just the 3 corrected files (bottom of the
>> list).
> Yep, right you are.  The 1st&  2nd hunk of the elf64-x86_64.c file needed
> to be fixed up, but the attached patch now applies cleanly for me.  Obviously,
> I can't test it myself, so if you or Andy would be so kind, I'll get it
> added to the book along with the Glibc upgrade.
> Also, can you confirm that the Glibc issue mentioned by Bruce at
> hits you as well,
> and we'll need to add the trivial sed to fix that too?  Again, I didn't hit
> this during my build.
Normally I'd jump right on it, but I don't have an available partition 
to test with right now, too many projects in queue right this second 
:-), but this weekend I should hopefully be done and be able to test in 
both multilib and x86_64 LFS.

-- DJ Lucas

This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list