dj at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Jun 7 18:23:41 PDT 2011
On 06/07/2011 09:49 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:14:59 -0500, DJ Lucas<dj at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>> On 06/06/2011 03:07 PM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>>> I'd prefer for us not to use HJL's binutils
>> Then don't. That patch doesn't look all that invasive..no need to add
>> tests for local build fix, just the 3 corrected files (bottom of the
> Yep, right you are. The 1st& 2nd hunk of the elf64-x86_64.c file needed
> to be fixed up, but the attached patch now applies cleanly for me. Obviously,
> I can't test it myself, so if you or Andy would be so kind, I'll get it
> added to the book along with the Glibc upgrade.
> Also, can you confirm that the Glibc issue mentioned by Bruce at
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2883#comment:1 hits you as well,
> and we'll need to add the trivial sed to fix that too? Again, I didn't hit
> this during my build.
Normally I'd jump right on it, but I don't have an available partition
to test with right now, too many projects in queue right this second
:-), but this weekend I should hopefully be done and be able to test in
both multilib and x86_64 LFS.
-- DJ Lucas
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
More information about the lfs-dev