glibc issues with --enable-kernel=18.104.22.168
matthew at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Jan 25 01:17:38 PST 2011
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:06:39 -0800, Bryan Kadzban <bryan at kadzban.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> I'm not sure if that's the best setup; we'll have to make sure at each
> glibc release (until the bug is fixed) that no new private-futex tests
> are added. (That the sed is still equivalent to the patch.) It'd be
> nice if the sed could take into account the context of each line, but I
> believe that's rather difficult with sed.
> Anyone else have a preference?
Given the relative complexity of Andrew's sed expression, and your concerns above,
I'd rather we go with the patch.
More information about the lfs-dev