glibc issues with --enable-kernel=

Matthew Burgess matthew at
Tue Jan 25 01:17:38 PST 2011

On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:06:39 -0800, Bryan Kadzban <bryan at> wrote:

> I'm not sure if that's the best setup; we'll have to make sure at each
> glibc release (until the bug is fixed) that no new private-futex tests
> are added.  (That the sed is still equivalent to the patch.)  It'd be
> nice if the sed could take into account the context of each line, but I
> believe that's rather difficult with sed.
> Anyone else have a preference?

Given the relative complexity of Andrew's sed expression, and your concerns above,
I'd rather we go with the patch.



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list