LFS Toolchain
Greg Schafer
gschafer at zip.com.au
Mon Jan 19 15:00:43 MST 2009
Ryan Oliver wrote:
> Look back into the clfs-lite that was proposed 4 years ago in the lfs wiki.
>
> Referenced here
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2005-April/051171.html
Vapour.
> 4 years ago your opinion was markedly different with regards to using
> cross-compilers for any part of the lfs toolchain.
Yes. This is true. But I now leverage cross compilation where it's
actually useful.
> You entirely miss the point of cross-lfs
Nobody here wants to bootstrap from Solaris.
>> if (*cross_compile == '0' || target_system_root)
>>
>> ie: if native build or sysrooted build
>>
>
> *HEH*
>
> Man you cant even understand simple code... and here I am having
> technical arguments with you...
You are posting late at night. This probably explains your confusion and
ranting. I'll try to say it again in different words so you can understand.
- The paths inside that conditional block take effect when a native
compiler.
- The paths inside that conditional block take effect when a sysrooted
compiler (cross or not cross).
Now, who is it that doesn't understand the code?
> Remember, for a sysrooted cross-compiler cross_compile == 1 AND
> target_system_root *IS* defined
Yes, which means the above referenced block of code will take effect
because it's a sysrooted compiler. Get it?
Please also keep in mind a sysrooted compiler doesn't have to be cross!
<Remainder of embarrassing drivel deleted>
Now. Let's all sit back, and enjoy the show while you explain your way out
of this one!
Regards
Greg
--
http://www.diy-linux.org/
More information about the lfs-dev
mailing list