Version in glibc
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Wed Nov 12 12:50:05 PST 2008
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> #define RELEASE "stable"
>> -#define VERSION "2.8"
>> +#define VERSION "2.8-20080929-LFS"
>> Is there any interest in doing something like this ?
> I like it except the -LFS. As we don't modify it one bit, why
> add the LFS? It is a stock weekly tarball unmodified. I don't
> think LFS is appropriate. JMHO.
It would be useful to identify the distro. This could easily be done in a sed.
I like 2.8-20080929-for_LFS
More information about the lfs-dev