Future of LFS - scripts and licenses

Bryan Kadzban bryan at kadzban.is-a-geek.net
Thu May 22 04:13:53 PDT 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> I think the consensus we're trying to reach is what to do with the
>> bootscripts if we do add them back to an Appendix as Bruce
>> suggested. Do we still install the bootscripts the current way or
>> does the appendix become a *replacement* for the bootscript package
>> installation in chapter 7.
> 
> I do think we should add the udev scripts also.

Agreed.  Although with -122, it's down to only two scripts (55-lfs and
61-cdrom), since the only rule in the 81-firmware.rules file has been
added to udev's 50-udev-default.rules file upstream.

>> I think it should be an addition, not a replacement.
> 
> Yes.  That was my intention.

Strongly agree here as well: I *don't* want to force people to copy the
contents of the scripts (or udev rules files).  :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFINVVwS5vET1Wea5wRAx0MAKCR20ZzEodO3+q1Bfim9rgg+oj1cwCgkr8C
5DwfJGmIHQx4ox9zPR3cAo4=
=hktL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list