LFS Roadmap (Was: Re: As promised: LFS compilation summary)

Randy McMurchy randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon May 12 07:37:24 PDT 2008


Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 05/12/08 09:28 CST:

> I suppose, at some point, we might want to be able to do multilib. But,
> at least when I started the branch, it was felt that we'd be better off
> just approaching a 64-bit only build. Whenever we do feel like adding
> multilib, build notes from various sources would be helpful, I'm sure.

I agree totally that trying to introduce multilib into LFS would be
very difficult for us right now. I wasn't trying to say we should. In
fact, I probably shouldn't have commented to the thread at all. But I
wasn't sure if the OP was talking Pure-64.

And now that I think about it some, multilib isn't that difficult for
LFS, it is BLFS where it becomes a total PITA (time-consuming).

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.22] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
09:32:01 up 85 days, 20 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.04



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list