LFS - DESTDIR Style
sysadm.taipan67 at btinternet.com
Mon Mar 31 09:24:30 PDT 2008
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> The implication of going to DESTDIR for LFS would imply doing the same
>> for BLFS. Some of the BLFS packages are not DESTDIR friendly. I can't
>> remember which ones off the top of my head, but I do recall some that
>> ignore DESTDIR, at least partially.
>> -- Bruce
> Openssl springs instantly to mind. If i recall correctly, i also had
> difficulties with shadow in LFS itself (sorry, it's been a while)...
From a Gentoo-ebuild for shadow, it looks like it honours DESTDIR, &
that my difficulties were permissions-related due to my use of the
It still has me wondering if this proposed branch would require or
benefit from the inclusion of the 'fakeroot' package, as used by
diy-linux? I've never built either, & am uncertain of it's precise
function - so this is pure speculation on my part...
More information about the lfs-dev