LiveCD or No LiveCD?

Alexander E. Patrakov patrakov at
Mon Feb 25 08:29:05 PST 2008

Bruce Dubbs wrote (somewhat reordered):

> I think we should just leave the project as quiescent, not kill it.  A live
> CD is useful, but it doesn't have to be completely current. For someone to
> use it, with a more current version of LFS, they will just need to download
> the sources separately.

But then, it has no advantage over, say, Ubuntu.

> Just leave it alone for now and we can look into updating it when a change 
> makes it necessary.

And here is a problem: it deviates too much from both LFS and BLFS, and contains 
a lot of undocumented material (e.g., the whole process of setting up the 
language, guessing the video driver, and the workaround for iwlwifi bugs in 
/etc/modprobe.conf--and note that the guessing process with break with Xorg-7.3, 
and nobody knows when the iwlwifi workaround is safe to remove). It may be 
easier to start from scratch instead of "updating" this quirky CD.

Alexander E. Patrakov

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list