The new build method is in...

[Bruce Dubbs]

Jim Gifford wrote:

> Enough on that subject, 

OK.  Time to move on.

> As far as LFS Dev privs, thanx but no thanx. You can delete them, not to 
> mention, someone changed by password on me a while back, because they 
> were afraid when CLFS moved away to it's own servers. I have no interest 
> in LFS goals, except to help out with any issues that my expertise can 
> be useful.

OK, but as far as I'm concerned, you are welcome.  I'll reset your password if 
you want.  No problem either way.

> CLFS is a subproject of LFS. CLFS does have a separate leadership, Ryan, 
> Joe, and myself. CLFS is not fork.
> CLFS does have developers that work exclusively on CLFS projects.
> CLFS does have it's own servers.
> CLFS does use a different license.
> 
> CLFS was originally intended to be the future of LFS, not necessarily 
> the cross-compiling, but pulling the updates required by new releases of 
> the toolchain. As it has been stated, CLFS can be easily be modified 
> make a LFS style book with no cross compiling.

That's clear enough.  I think its good to share each other's ideas.  I hope that 
we can all benefit from whatever CLFS or DIY or LFS is doing.  I want us all to 
be colleagues who respect all input.

   -- Bruce