bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Sat Oct 27 22:11:39 PDT 2007
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> where Kay is saying usb_id needs to be fixed, and this udev git commit:
> I tried to patch udev116 with this and it didn't work. I did a
> cut/paste of the patch to a file, but only the first segment applied.
> The other three rejected.
> Is there something different about this patch format? I can generate
> the patch without too much problem, but I wonder why the cut/paste
> doesn't work.
Never mind. In the git generated file are constructs like:
@@ -224,8 +222,6 @@ static int usb_id(const char *devpath)
It should just be:
@@ -224,8 +222,6 @@
The annotation with the function name on the line seems to confuse patch.
More information about the lfs-dev