Grub 2
Bruce Dubbs
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Thu Oct 18 16:37:08 MDT 2007
This is a bit of a rant.
After reviewing the thread on 'mktemp, tempfile & coreutils', I asked my
self what is the big deal about Grub 2. I went to the Grub home page
and did some reading.
My reaction is "Are they out of their minds?" My conclusion is yes.
The whole idea of a bootloader is to get the OS up and running. I
looked at http://grub.enbug.org/CommandList and am astounded.
This goes completely against the Unix philosophy of making simple single
function tools. Why are they trying to do lsmod/rmmod, enter rescue
mode, set and unset variables, run scripts, and so forth. They are
trying to recreate the kernel.
I don't have a problem with rewriting Grub, but they have let feature
creep run away and lost sight of the purpose of the application. Just
because you *can* do something doesn't mean that you *should* do it.
I don't see LFS going to this for a *long* time.
-- Bruce
More information about the lfs-dev
mailing list