Fixing Gawk's configure bugs

Matthew Burgess matthew at
Mon Apr 30 12:43:01 PDT 2007

On Monday 30 April 2007 20:20:23 Dan Nicholson wrote:

> Nice job on the upstream patch. It's not really a strong objection,
> but I'm not crazy about applying a 15k patch when the issue can be
> worked around in one command. I don't feel strongly enough to keep it
> out, though, if that's what others want.

Yep, I was shocked at the bloat in the patch too - I guess that's the price 
one pays for portability!  I've submitted the patch upstream, so I guess 
we'll pick it up when the next release is made.  For now, I'm happy for the 
commands to stay as they are.



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list