[RFC] Drop the Coreutils Uname patch

Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Tue Apr 24 22:19:37 PDT 2007

Greg Schafer wrote:
> Robert Connolly wrote:
>> On Tuesday April 24 2007 02:50, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>> On the computer I'm typing this message on, 'uname -a' reports this:
>>> Linux rmlscsi #1 PREEMPT Sat Mar 25 07:47:39 CST 2006 i686
>>> pentium3 i386 GNU/Linux
>>> What would it report without the patch?
>> The "pentium3" would become "unknown". The patch sets "uname -p".
> You are technically incorrect.
> An unpatched `uname -a' simply omits the -p and -i fields when they are
> "unknown".
> $ uname --help
> Usage: uname [OPTION]...
> Print certain system information.  With no OPTION, same as -s.
>   -a, --all                print all information, in the following order,
>                              except omit -p and -i if unknown:

That looks like a recent change to the behavior.

  -- Bruce

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list