[RFC] Drop the Coreutils Uname patch

Randy McMurchy lfs-user at mcmurchy.com
Mon Apr 23 23:50:55 PDT 2007

Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 04/20/07 16:55 CST:

> Given that all 3 books use different patches, it serves a purely cosmetic 
> purpose (as far as I know), and upstream will not entertain the patch at all 
> in its current form, I'd like to drop it.
> Thoughts, comments?

On the computer I'm typing this message on, 'uname -a' reports this:

Linux rmlscsi #1 PREEMPT Sat Mar 25 07:47:39 CST 2006 i686 pentium3 i386 GNU/Linux

What would it report without the patch?


rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.24] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux i686]
01:50:01 up 30 min, 1 user, load average: 0.21, 0.13, 0.11

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list