[RFC] Bootscript changes

Dan Nicholson dbn.lists at gmail.com
Fri Apr 20 10:35:30 PDT 2007


On 4/15/07, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/11/07, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Attached is a series of patches that hopefully resolves all the issues
> > below. The functions seem to work fine in my testing. I'll describe
> > them a bit below.
>
> No one's said anything, so I'm committing these patches. I'm also
> going to roll a new bootscripts tarball some time soon.

I'm rolling a new tarball now to get these fixes in the book. If
anyone wonders why the tarball grew so much, it's because this has
DJ's LSB style scripts in contrib/.

> One other idea I had. What about adding a "-s" argument to statusproc
> so that it won't return any output? This is in line with the other
> *proc functions that silence they're output. This would allow me to
> not redirect output for this:
>
> statusproc process && do something that would bomb without the running process

I may address this later, but it's not high priority.

--
Dan



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list