[RFC] Bootscript changes

Dan Nicholson dbn.lists at gmail.com
Sun Apr 15 11:17:05 PDT 2007

On 4/15/07, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> One other idea I had. What about adding a "-s" argument to statusproc
> so that it won't return any output? This is in line with the other
> *proc functions that silence they're output. This would allow me to
> not redirect output for this:
> statusproc process && do something that would bomb without the running process

Of course, I forgot to add the -s argument, statusproc -s process.


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list