[new XSL] Ready for inputs.
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Sun Apr 8 12:10:37 PDT 2007
>> 1. The font on the headers doesn't seem right. Most of the text is
>> standard serif fonts (computer modern?). That looks fine. The headers
>> are sans-serif and bold. The bold seems a little too wide.
> My acroreader say that the used ones are this
Is this a function of the reader's system or the system that renders the
pdf. I thought the actual fonts used were enclosed in the file. I'm
not 100% sure though.
>> 2. The highlighted text has borders that seem a little heavy. The
>> notes have borders that are light gray. 'Important' and 'Caution' areas
>> have the heavy border too. Perhaps removing the border completely from
>> the gray backgrounds and using the light gray border for all the light
>> yellow backgrounds would give a better visual appearance.
> The colors and border are the same than the ones used on the XHTML output.
> The border could be changed from 1pc to 0.5pc to make ir less heavy, but in
> resume I would to have the same look in both versions.
0.5pc? I think that's a pica which is
1 PostScript pica = 4.23333333 millimeters
I don't think the borders are that thick--at least not on my system. My
estimate is about 1 mm. Are you sure that's not the margin?
Where is the border specified? Perhaps we could do some preprocessing
for the pdf.
More information about the lfs-dev