archaic at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Oct 31 14:15:30 PST 2005
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:53:11AM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> On the second thought, I tend to agree that there is no need to use
> config.site in regular LFS, IF a permission is granted to deviate and
> use config.site instead of the official LFS instructions for the purpose
> of building the official LFS LiveCD.
Sometimes I think you overstress the need for absolute duplication
between the book and the livecd makefiles. If the instructions are the
same, what does it matter if you use config.site and the book doesn't?
As long as changes to the book are accurately tracked, I see no problem
with the makefiles using config.site.
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
More information about the lfs-dev