Matthew Burgess matthew at
Sat Oct 29 13:58:34 PDT 2005

Jim Gifford wrote:
> We have ran into a issue of it failing on Solaris, that's the reason for 
> the patch.

Ah, so it's a patch specific to /tools (or cross-lfs equivalent).  In 
that case, it's obviously fine for cross-lfs, though I'll leave it out 
of LFS as it doesn't affect us (at least I know of no Linux distros that 
enforce the level of POSIX compatibility required to trigger the build 
failure).  I'm more than willing to add the patch to LFS if such a 
distro is found, of course.



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list