Cross X86_64 Question /usr/lib64

Duncan Webb duncan at linuxowl.com
Fri Oct 28 09:52:57 PDT 2005


Ken Moffat wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Duncan Webb wrote:
>
>> I've a question arising from the build of xorg. xorg decided to 
>> install it's libraries and modules into /usr/lib64
>>
>> On a pure64 system this directory is not created.
>>
>> Question is:
>> 1) should a symlink from /usr/lib to /usr/lib64 be created in the 
>> section Creating Directories in chapters 7 & 8
>> or
>> 2) #define HaveLib64               NO in the xc/config/cf/host.def
>>
>> Regards,
>> Duncan
>>
>  BLFS issues.  Since the BLFS book is purely x86 at the moment, this 
> sort of thing is better discussed on blfs-support.  If you search the 
> archives for blfs-support, you will find that pure64 wants three 
> defines in host.def - HaveLib64 only controls the libGL symlink, you 
> also want
>
> #define LibDirName lib
> #define LibDir /usr/X11R6/lib/X11
>
> (obviously, the last of these assumes you are using the old 
> /usr/X11R6, if you put pure64 X into /usr you'll have to document the 
> issues yourself)
>
>  Hint for search.linuxfromscratch.org: look for both x86_64 and pure64.

I  agree that  xorg is a BLFS support issue and that deals with case 2.

Case 1 is a bit like /usr/man link to /usr/share/man, which is a LFS 
cross issue.

That's why I posted it here.

Sorry if this was wrong.
Duncan





More information about the lfs-dev mailing list