Andrew Benton wrote: > I used gcc-4.0.2 and didn't apply any patches to glibc. Roland McGrath is readying 2.3.6. See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2005-10/msg00023.html. It too should be able to handle gcc-4.0.2 just fine. No, it's not as bleeding edge as CVS HEAD, but some of us can't stand that level of "fun" :) Regards, Matt.