[RFC] LFS-6.1.1

Ken Moffat ken at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Oct 14 13:35:36 PDT 2005

On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Matthew Burgess wrote:

> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>>> 4) Do something with the udev configuration vs. /etc/group conflict 
>>> reported in bug 1639.
>>  How about the udev version ?  Should we stick with 056 or upgrade it to 
>> 070 ?  (I seem to remember that something newer than 056 was needed for 
>> newer kernels at some point, but maybe that was only a problem when 
>> booting.)
> Well, if we upgrade udev, will that act as a precedent to upgrade all the 
> other packages too?  Or is there a particular bug in 056 that you want to see 
> fixed in 6.1.1?  I can't remember the exact combinations of kernel and udev 
> that play well together/break each other, but I have a feeling if we upgrade 
> either, we'd need to upgrade the other too.

  I'm happy to stick with 056, unless it bites me on any of my builds.

  das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list