glibc bug in LFS-6.1 and its nALFS profile

Justin Knierim lfs at
Thu Oct 6 13:10:17 PDT 2005

Matthew Burgess wrote:

> LFS obviously can't be fixed in situ, so an errata will be published.  
> nALFS would then implement the fix(es) specified by all the errata 
> that apply to LFS-6.1, and the LiveCD would pick up the fixed nALFS 
> profiles and also itself be built with the fixes mentioned in any 
> applicable errata.

That sounds reasonable to me.  The errata fixes are not so numerous that 
it would take much time to make another livecd release, at least in my 


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list