glibc bug in LFS-6.1 and its nALFS profile
jmhuntwork at linuxfromscratch.org
Thu Oct 6 11:22:11 PDT 2005
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> As for the Right Thing To Do for the livecd, I think that the general
> rule should be to follow the book wherever possible, but deal with any
> and all errata as they become known. Otherwise, we're effectively
> giving folks a known broken/insecure install by default.
So, as this statement applies to the current situation and bug, are you
saying that the LiveCD should release a 6.1-4 CD with this fix in it? If
so, then what book and nALFS profile does the CD include? The CD itself
would be fixed, but the instructions it provides to the user for
building LFS would still be broken.
Unless you're resting this statement on the belief that the user will
actually visit the LFS site, read the errata and make the necessary
change to their build/nALFS profile...
More information about the lfs-dev