glibc bug in LFS-6.1 and its nALFS profile

Jeremy Huntwork jhuntwork at
Thu Oct 6 09:05:38 PDT 2005

Steve Prior wrote:
> I don't disagree with that philosophy JH.  What I think should be the issue
> now is to determine how serious this GLIBC issue really is.  If it is a
> serious security issue and therefore makes "LFS 6.1 stable" a defective 
> release (don't
> mean this as bad work against the LFS group, just that a bad apple got into
> the pile), then I think it might be time for LFS 6.1.1 which the LiveCD 
> could then track
> faithfully.

Yes, my point exactly. If the bug is in LFS then *that* should be fixed 
and released, and in turn, the LiveCD can follow suit.

Thanks for the detailed reply, Steve.


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list