Use of Entities in the cross-lfs book

Jim Gifford lfs at jg555.com
Tue Jun 21 13:09:27 PDT 2005


M.Canales.es wrote:

>El Martes, 21 de Junio de 2005 21:42, Jim Gifford escribió:
>  
>
>>SBU's are going to be invalid up to chapter 9, chapter 9 will be the
>>first chapter that we could provide SBU information.
>>    
>>
>
>I agree.
>
>That meant that SBUs could be removed in other chapters, true?
>
>  
>
>>My plan for packages.ent was something simliar to what archaic was
>>suggesting
>>
>><!-- Package 1 -->
>><!ENTITY package-version "2.59">
>><!ENTITY package-size "2.3 MB">
>><!ENTITY package-url "http://url/to/package/official/download"
>><!ENTITY package-buildsize "81 MB">
>><!ENTITY package-time "0.3 SBU">
>>
>>The one thing I'm not sure on is if the SBU's will be the same on the
>>different architectures, 
>>    
>>
>
>I we can to use the same SBU and build size on al archs that would be great.
>
>IMHO a desviation < 5 % (or maybe 10%) could be acceptable for both, SBUs and 
>build sizes. 
>
>
>  
>
Sounds good to me, but I will defer to Matt to say if it's ok.

-- 
------
jim at linuxfromscratch.org
lfs at jg555.com

LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list