Use of Entities in the cross-lfs book

M.Canales.es manuel at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Jun 21 13:03:33 PDT 2005


El Martes, 21 de Junio de 2005 21:42, Jim Gifford escribió:
> SBU's are going to be invalid up to chapter 9, chapter 9 will be the
> first chapter that we could provide SBU information.

I agree.

That meant that SBUs could be removed in other chapters, true?

> My plan for packages.ent was something simliar to what archaic was
> suggesting
>
> <!-- Package 1 -->
> <!ENTITY package-version "2.59">
> <!ENTITY package-size "2.3 MB">
> <!ENTITY package-url "http://url/to/package/official/download"
> <!ENTITY package-buildsize "81 MB">
> <!ENTITY package-time "0.3 SBU">
>
> The one thing I'm not sure on is if the SBU's will be the same on the
> different architectures, 

I we can to use the same SBU and build size on al archs that would be great.

IMHO a desviation < 5 % (or maybe 10%) could be acceptable for both, SBUs and 
build sizes. 


-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list