SBU calculations

David Jensen djensen at
Wed Jun 15 15:59:54 PDT 2005

Archaic wrote:

>Now for the sake of current BLFS svn, I see no need to change this in
>6.1, but for future releases I propose the entire build instructions be
>used which would add:
>make -C ld clean
>make -C ld LIB_PATH=/tools/lib
>Now there is no reason to add this *except* that section 4.5 of the book
>(which explains SBU's) can explicitly state that all commands in grey
>text should be encapsulated in the time command if you want to measure
>the SBU value for that package. Then it leaves little to chance and
>helps keeps all the developers and readers on the same page.
>Again, I am proposing this for post-6.1.
I don't think it's a big thing,  BLFS sbu ratios would then be 
*slightly* high.
Few would notice.

David Jensen

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list