bryan at kadzban.is-a-geek.net
Mon Jun 13 03:54:04 PDT 2005
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>>> I suppose the 20 line scan.l hunk in it is redundant, though it's
>>> not going to save that much space in the grand scheme of things.
>> It won't save space, but removing that file from the patch will
>> prevent scan.c from being rebuilt. Which was (part of) the whole
> Well, I shuffled the scan.l and scan.c parts around so that scan.c
> wouldn't be rebuilt (`patch' should touch scan.c last, thereby
> fooling `make' into thinking that scan.c is up to date).
Ah, I didn't catch that. OK, then it is merely redundant.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the lfs-dev