flex-2.5.31

Bryan Kadzban bryan at kadzban.is-a-geek.net
Mon Jun 13 03:54:04 PDT 2005


Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> 
>> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>> 
>>> I suppose the 20 line scan.l hunk in it is redundant, though it's
>>> not going to save that much space in the grand scheme of things.
>> 
>> It won't save space, but removing that file from the patch will
>> prevent scan.c from being rebuilt.  Which was (part of) the whole
>> point.
> 
> Well, I shuffled the scan.l and scan.c parts around so that scan.c 
> wouldn't be rebuilt (`patch' should touch scan.c last, thereby
> fooling `make' into thinking that scan.c is up to date).

Ah, I didn't catch that.  OK, then it is merely redundant.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/attachments/20050613/d30c6ea3/attachment.sig>


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list