matthew at linuxfromscratch.org
Sun Jun 12 23:41:17 PDT 2005
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>>I suppose the 20 line scan.l hunk in it is redundant, though it's not
>>going to save that much space in the grand scheme of things.
> It won't save space, but removing that file from the patch will prevent
> scan.c from being rebuilt. Which was (part of) the whole point.
Well, I shuffled the scan.l and scan.c parts around so that scan.c
wouldn't be rebuilt (`patch' should touch scan.c last, thereby fooling
`make' into thinking that scan.c is up to date).
More information about the lfs-dev