[RFC] Add CrackLib to Chapter 6 LFS
archaic at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Aug 5 00:01:52 PDT 2005
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 01:50:16AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> At this point is seems 5 people have agreed that adding CrackLib
> is a good idea. Best as I can recall now, 3 have not.
As an optional, yes. I also concur. However, the point that you just
don't seem to be accepting is that a hint serves exactly that purpose.
I am baffled why someone who "doesn't care" would be keeping a tally,
though, instead of just writing a hint (which would have taken less time
and energy than writing more than 30 messages in this thread).
People do oppose the addition, and some people agree conditionally to
the addition. No one is debating the hint route. It gets the information
to the readers and solves the original concern just as fully as an
addition to the LFS packages would.
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
More information about the lfs-dev