[RFC] Add CrackLib to Chapter 6 LFS
jhuntwork at linuxfromscratch.org
Thu Aug 4 22:33:35 PDT 2005
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Archaic wrote these words on 08/05/05 00:18 CST:
>>I have already stated it. There is no *technical* reason for including
>>it in a base development system.
> That is not a reason to not include it.
/me blinks. about:kitchensink!
> I'm sorry. What keeps users from setting their passwords to "password"?
Absolutely nothing, and that's how it should be. I don't think LFS needs
to enforce good security practices. Plugging open holes is one thing,
forcing a user to use strong passwords is quite another.
More information about the lfs-dev