[RFC] Add CrackLib to Chapter 6 LFS
LFS-User at mcmurchy.com
Thu Aug 4 19:30:05 PDT 2005
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 08/04/05 21:19 CST:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>>Well, add it without question then. As long as the book mentions that
>>you can skip it if you want.
> If that's the case it's not needed then.
With all due respect Jim, your contributions have so far been
worthless to this thread.
What are you saying is not needed?
Jeremy's suggestion that the package can be skipped, or the
installation of the package altogether?
This is a discussion of the proposal to add Cracklib to the default
LFS build. I have yet to get anything from you positively or
Please, just give your answer as "Yes, I think it is a good idea",
or "No, it is not a good idea because ...."
Now, the "...." above is mandatory, so that we can determine what
is wrong with the proposal.
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 22.214.171.124.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
21:24:00 up 124 days, 20:57, 2 users, load average: 0.09, 0.51, 0.63
More information about the lfs-dev