Cross-LFS gcc-3.4.3-posix-1.patch

TheOldFellow theoldfellow at
Tue Apr 26 07:38:45 PDT 2005

Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Hi Again,

> So. Any ideas on how best to work around this one? Shall we alter the
> patch? Or, shall we drop the suggestion to unpack just the core tarball?

Most people will eventually need the full gcc.  I've never used the core


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list