Ready for gcc-4 & cleaning up binutils source delete or not.

Bryan Kadzban bryan at kadzban.is-a-geek.net
Mon Apr 18 03:56:15 PDT 2005


Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Ryan.Oliver at pha.com.au wrote:
> 
>> I suppose though we'll need 2 host compilers, we'll need a 3.4 for 
>> the kernel builds etc
> 
> Why?

I'm just guessing here, but I would bet that it'll be similar to the gcc
2.95 / gcc 3.X upgrade.  The kernel documentation said to use 2.95 (and
still does, in fact), so that's what we did, until it started causing
problems with the NPTL tests.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/attachments/20050418/e2b30953/attachment.sig>


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list