Ready for gcc-4 & cleaning up binutils source delete or not.

Jeremy Utley jeremy at
Sat Apr 16 14:39:05 PDT 2005

Matthew Burgess wrote:

> TheOldFellow wrote:
>> However it's the LFS new technology gestation period that gets me down.
>>      And I only have i686 boxes :-(
> This isn't meant to sound as harsh as it's going to.  But, if you 
> don't like the length of time it takes to get new technology into LFS 
> then post *patches* to the XML book sources, not scripts :)

But there's still the lengthy community decision process to deal with 
before it makes it into rendered XML.  That was the whole crux of the 
Unstable branch of LFS, so those of us who were interested in playing 
with that stuff could do so easily.  Now that's gone :(  And the simple 
fact is, GCC 4.0 is not quite yet ready for integration into the LFS 
book - it probably won't be until 4.0.3 or thereabouts.


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list