Ready for gcc-4 & cleaning up binutils source delete or not.
randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat Apr 16 12:18:53 PDT 2005
TheOldFellow wrote these words on 04/16/05 14:12 CST:
> I had no difficulty building a reasonably stable gcc-4/glibc-2.3.5
> system that carried BLFS with just a few patches all the way up to a
> gnome build (with a few oddities in gnome, I admit, but that's usual
> with my gnome builds) plus the Mozilla family too.
I'm not trying to stir the pot, but would like you to answer one
simple question for folks like me that don't know the answer, yet
it is the most important of all.
What advantage do you see in your "reasonably stable" system over
one that builds "very stable" using existing LFS methods?
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 188.8.131.52.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
14:16:00 up 14 days, 13:49, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
More information about the lfs-dev